In this article I will be comparing 3 different views regarding dreams, Freud’s View, Biologists View, and the view addressed in the book cite below. To do so I will be presenting 9 different “yes or no” propositions and will answer them from the perspective of each view.
- Dreams are irrational or psychotic mental products
- Freud’s view: yes
- Biologists: yes
- Source view: no
- Every dreams is a fulfillment of a wish
- Freud’s view: yes
- Biologists: no
- Source View: no
- Dreams are “the royal road” or at least a good road to the unconscious
- Freud’s view: yes
- Biologists: no
- Source View: yes
- Dreams are disguised-the products of censorship
- Freud’s View: yes
- Biologists: no
- Source View: no
- Dreams are essentially a random pattern of activity
- Freud’s View: no
- Biologists: yesa
- Source View: no
- The dreams (manifest dream) is important without interpretation or translation
- Freud’s View: no
- Biologists: no
- Source View: yes
- Dreams are useful (functional) even if forgotten
- Freud’d View: no
- Biologists: no
- Source View: yes
- Dreaming is on a continuum with waking, reverie, daydreaming
- Freud’s View: no
- Biologist: no
- Source View: yes
- In dreaming begin responsibilities
- Freud’s View: no
- Biologists: no
- Source View: yes
I wouldn’t say that after learning these basics that my opinion has changed because a personal opinion is still developing. I would say that it opened up my mind a little bit to see other standing opinions about dreams.
Source Type: Book
Source: Dreams and Nightmares- The New Theory on the origin and meaning of dreams by Ernest Hartmann M.D.